Scorcese's film continues to trigger questions.
What motivates a Jordan Belfort -- or a Bernie Madoff?
Both were obviously smart, talented and charismatic.
If they'd played by the rules, they'd be rich today -- and respected.
So why did they cheat?
Are they sociopaths, pathologically addicted to deceit and destruction? "I'm smarter than everybody else!"
![]() |
Bernie Madoff |
(With Madoff, there's some evidence to this effect.)
Did they misread the 'chess position' because of some paranoia or blind spot? "I can only win if I cheat."
(I'm aware of no evidence that either had a dreadful childhood or other factors that might trigger neuroses.)
Were they thrill-seekers, addicted to the rush of breaking the law and basic standards of decency? "What a rush!"
(Belfort appears to be prone to addiction.)
We mere mortals are tricky, lazy and deceitful - but most of us try to adhere to basic ethical standards.
Why didn't Belfort, Madoff and all the other touts?
I'd be obliged for your thoughts.
Best,
Pascal
0 comments:
Post a Comment